Jul 1, 2025

Alternatives to Box: Why Microsoft-Native eSHARE Is the Smarter Choice

As organizations embrace GenAI and Microsoft Copilot, the architecture of your collaboration platform matters more than ever. If you’re searching for the best alternatives to Box, it’s important to look at how well a solution integrates with Microsoft 365.
Box was built for a pre-Microsoft 365 world. Its external storage model creates friction, silos, and governance headaches. By contrast, eSHARE is purpose-built for Microsoft 365—keeping your data sovereign, secure, and ready for AI transformation.
The Problem with Box in a Microsoft 365 World
Box requires organizations to:
• Duplicate data outside their primary productivity environment.
• Switch contexts between M365 and a separate platform.
• Maintain parallel governance structures.
Its perimeter-based security model is out of step with Zero Trust and modern compliance requirements.
Why Most Enterprises Choose Microsoft-Native Collaboration
Over 1 million organizations have standardized on Microsoft 365, investing heavily in Teams, SharePoint, Purview, Defender, and now Copilot. Running Box alongside Microsoft 365 means:
• Duplicate infrastructure
• Retraining users
• Fragmented governance
eSHARE enhances your Microsoft 365 investment instead of duplicating it—delivering seamless, secure, and AI-ready collaboration.
Key Benefits of Choosing eSHARE as a Box Alternative
• Data sovereignty: Files remain in your M365 tenant.
• Security: Up to 90% attack surface reduction.
• Productivity: 3× faster sharing, 3× adoption.
• Cost efficiency: $10–$15M annual savings.
• Copilot & GenAI readiness: Unified single source for better AI outcomes.
Migration to eSHARE Is Simple
Teams moving from Box to eSHARE see immediate ROI:
90%+ user adoption
Reduced attack surface
Future-readiness for Copilot and GenAI
Because eSHARE is native to Microsoft 365, migration requires no retraining and delivers fast results.
If you’re evaluating alternatives to Box for secure external collaboration in Microsoft 365, eSHARE is the Microsoft-native choice.
Make the strategic move today:
Unify governance and security with Microsoft-native architecture.
Accelerate productivity with frictionless sharing and workflow integration.
Prepare your organization for Copilot and GenAI transformation.
Reduce risk and complexity by eliminating duplicate platforms.
Choose the future of Trusted Collaboration. Choose eSHARE.

FAQs: Box Alternatives and eSHARE
1. What are the best alternatives to Box for enterprises using Microsoft 365?
eSHARE is the leading Microsoft-native alternative to Box. Unlike Box, it keeps all files in your M365 tenant, reducing duplication, simplifying compliance, and preparing your data for Copilot and GenAI.
2. How is eSHARE different from Box?
Box copies files to an external environment, creating silos and parallel governance. eSHARE keeps files in Microsoft 365, unifying policies, security, and user experience.
3. Is eSHARE more secure than Box?
Yes. eSHARE reduces attack surface by up to 90% by eliminating duplicate data stores, while leveraging M365’s Zero Trust controls (Purview, Defender, DLP).
4. Will switching from Box to eSHARE save money?
Organizations typically save $10–$15M annually by consolidating platforms, eliminating duplicate infrastructure, and reducing training costs.
5. Why is eSHARE better for AI and Copilot than Box?
GenAI and Copilot need a single source of truth. eSHARE ensures all content stays in-tenant, enabling better grounding and more accurate AI results.
6. How hard is it to migrate from Box to eSHARE?
Migration is straightforward since users remain in Microsoft 365. Most organizations see 90%+ adoption within weeks.

eSHARE vs Box: A Side-by-Side Comparison
Capability Box (External Platform) eSHARE (Microsoft‑Native) Why it Matters
Where files live Copied to external environment Stay in your Microsoft 365 tenant Single source of truth improves security, compliance, and AI/Copilot grounding.
Governance Parallel policies & permissions Unified with Purview labels & DLP One model = simpler audits, fewer gaps, less overhead.
Security posture Legacy/perimeter‑based Zero Trust via M365 controls Consistent enforcement across all data reduces risk.
User experience Context switching out of M365 Work in the flow of M365 Higher adoption; fewer workarounds/shadow IT.
AI/Copilot readiness Fragmented context across platforms Unified context; single source of truth Better LLM grounding and governance alignment.
Attack surface Expanded via duplication ~90% reduction Less duplication = fewer breach paths.
Cost structure Duplicate infrastructure & training Consolidation; leverage existing M365 Potential $10–$15M hard savings annually from platform consolidation.
Time to share Slower due to platform boundaries 3× faster sharing Speed without sacrificing compliance.
Productivity Users fight the tool 3× productivity gains Security becomes “invisible” to users; work stays in M365.
eSHARE

Download Mark Cassetta's Presentation

Build Bridges, Not Barriers:
Achieving Trusted Collaboration in the AI Era

Contact Us

Fill in the form and download the full comparison datasheet.